000 03549nab a2200385 c 4500
001 vtls000794341
003 RU-ToGU
005 20210922111352.0
007 cr |
008 210226|2020 enk s a eng d
024 7 _a10.1080/03949370.2019.1640799
_2doi
035 _ato000794341
040 _aRU-ToGU
_brus
_cRU-ToGU
245 1 0 _aLearning from the environment: how predation changes the behavior of terrestrial Isopoda (Crustacea Oniscidea)
_cG. R. Cazzolla, G. Messina, F. Tiralongo [et al.]
336 _aТекст
337 _aэлектронный
504 _aБиблиогр.: с. 43-45
520 3 _aTerrestrial isopods have adapted to predatory pressures by evolving a variety of behaviors, which arise from a combination of specific traits, such as volvation and tonic immobility. Evolutionarily, these behavioral adaptations have been shown to increase the fitness of the individuals of the species who show them because the probability of being predated is reduced due to the loss of interest by the predator towards the immobile prey and the increase of interest towards the other mobile ones. Even if some of these behaviors have been shown to have a genetic basis, there is limited knowledge about the effects of environmental influences and predatorinduced learning abilities on the antipredatory strategies of invertebrates, and isopods in particular. Our study aimed to understand the degree to which “nature” and “nurture” (i.e. environmental and genetic factors) and their interactions influence these antipredatory behaviors. There might be a difference in the behavior of wild and captive isopods in their volvation frequency and duration of tonic immobility due to environmental factors (i.e. predation) that induce learning-related behavioral changes. Therefore, we tested this hypothesis. We applied the three types of stimuli, which aim to simulate the interaction of the predator with the isopod. All three species showed a significant difference, between individuals collected in the field (wild) and raised in the laboratory (captive), in the reaction to the stimulus that simulates the fall from a bird’s beak or from the jaws of a lizard after a catch. Although volvation frequency was highly species- and stimulus-specific, the duration of tonic immobility and the delay in the response to each stimulus, when significant, was always higher in wild groups than captive ones. These substantial differences may reflect the evolutionary and ecological characteristics of each species and the importance of environmental pressures to shape the behavior of these invertebrates to optimize their life strategies.
653 _aизоподы
653 _aповедение
653 _aхищничество
653 _aназемные равноногие раки
653 _aповеденческие адаптации
655 4 _aстатьи в журналах
_9745982
700 1 _aMessina, Giuseppina
_9480823
700 1 _aTiralongo, Francesco
_9510747
700 1 _aUrsino, Lorenzo A.
_9510748
700 1 _aLombardo, Bianca M.
_9480825
700 1 _aCazzolla Gatti, Roberto
_9160517
773 0 _tEthology ecology & evolution
_d2020
_gVol. 32, № 1. P. 29-45
_x0394-9370
852 4 _aRU-ToGU
856 4 _uhttp://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000794341
908 _aстатья
999 _c480263