| 000 | 02286nab a2200361 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | vtls000661509 | ||
| 003 | RU-ToGU | ||
| 005 | 20220222130540.0 | ||
| 007 | cr | | ||
| 008 | 190829|2019 ru s a eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.17223/1998863Х/48/19 _2doi |
|
| 035 | _ato000661509 | ||
| 040 |
_aRU-ToGU _brus _cRU-ToGU |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aKirillova, Nataliya P. _9380959 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTruth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Karamazov Brothers _cN. P. Kirillova, E. N. Lisanyuk |
| 246 | 1 | 1 | _aИстина и судебная аргументация в романе Ф. М. Достоевского "Братья Карамазовы" |
| 504 | _aБиблиогр.: 23 назв. | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aWe examine the reasons of the judicial error in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by Fyodor Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, adversary and investigative, and that the three con-ceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent judicial errors when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion. | |
| 600 | 1 | 4 |
_aДостоевский, Федор Михайлович _d1821-1881 _tБратья Карамазовы _984519 |
| 653 | _aистина | ||
| 653 | _aюридическая аргументация | ||
| 653 | _aюридические ошибки | ||
| 653 | _aсудебные процессы | ||
| 653 | _aсостязательная модель | ||
| 653 | _aрозыскная модель | ||
| 655 | 4 |
_aстатьи в журналах _9681159 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aLisanyuk, Elena N. _9380960 |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_tВестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология _d2019 _g№ 48. С. 193-204 _x1998-863X _w0210-41760 |
|
| 852 | 4 | _aRU-ToGU | |
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000661509 | |
| 908 | _aстатья | ||
| 999 | _c311112 | ||