Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky's The Karamazov Brothers N. P. Kirillova, E. N. Lisanyuk
Material type:
ArticleOther title: Истина и судебная аргументация в романе Ф. М. Достоевского "Братья Карамазовы" [Parallel title]Subject(s): Достоевский, Федор Михайлович 1821-1881 Братья Карамазовы | истина | юридическая аргументация | юридические ошибки | судебные процессы | состязательная модель | розыскная модельGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online
In:
Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология № 48. С. 193-204Abstract: We examine the reasons of the judicial error in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by Fyodor Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, adversary and investigative, and that the three con-ceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent judicial errors when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.
Библиогр.: 23 назв.
We examine the reasons of the judicial error in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by Fyodor Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, adversary and investigative, and that the three con-ceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent judicial errors when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.
There are no comments on this title.